Archives for posts with tag: syria


One American News Networks gave a lengthy video about their investigation. The reporter finds no evidence of Chemical Weapons Attack in Douma, Syria.

He went to several parts of the town and spoke to many people in various places.

He visited hospitals and spoke to staff, doctors and Chief Surgeon. The video we saw was made because people came in and choked from dust created by the bombs from USA, UK and France.

The surgeon explained if there was a chemical gas attack it would make people faces sell up, eyes streaming and choking from lungs being affected. He claimed further that there were no deaths.

The reporter also spoke to the rebels and they admitted it was a hoax to keep the Syrian army out of Douma and to achieve a bus service for evacuation which they used to escape.

A Syrian girl also explains what happened behind the last ‘Chemical Attack’ in Douma on YouTube. The picture you saw of a family died of the so-called ‘Chemical Attack’ was a family living in a bunker using a wood burning stove and died of carbon monocide.

She also points out for Assad doing the ‘Chemical Attack’ had no motive because he was winning the war. She thinks it is all for Trump’s benefit to keep US soldiers in Syria with Israel’s support.  

A report in the Morning Star

Deputy Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said: “the consequences of illegal, unlawful military actions were the cause of the hold-up which inspectors were unable to access the side of the alleged attacks because it needs permission from the UN security experts.”

Not as UK press announced ‘the Russian refused OPCW to enter Douma’ which was slightly twisting the truth but would go against the Russians.

The Independent newspaper’s journalist Robert Fisk was one of the first to enter Douma. He tracked down the underground clinic from where the videos were made.

Dr Assim Rahaibani said that the videos were not staged but the patients did not suffer from chemical gases but from dust which filled the rubble-filled tunnels where they live. On the night of the heavy shelling it created a dust storm.

That explained why the patients did not show any chemical burn marks, coughing, wheezing and streaming red eyes if they were infected by a chemical attack.

France still insists that it has “proof” of chemical weapons were used – USA media reports urine and blood tests showed evidence – USA also insists on its original report of previous chemical attacks although investigated by WHO but reports were never published which makes it suspicious of not being Assad’s attack and so does UK.

A good confirmation is that people across the town denied there was a chemical gas attack – more detailed information from Robert Fisk in the Independent newspaper.

Although those reports are the truth, but it is hard for the public being constantly bombarded with false information. However, the people today are well informed and May should gamble on being able to brainwash them.

So where does May, Trump and Macro go from here after the contradicting reports being published? They must be aware of it.

It was most surprising for the public the speed they all went ahead with their bombing. They did not wait for the OPCW to go there and to find the evidence they so insist exist. This point is the most confusing for the people to accept and understand. You don’t rush in with bombing if you want evidence of a chemical attack and who done it, do you?

Or was this the reason for the sudden decisions to bomb? It would show that it wasn’t Russia or Assad and three non-so-wise kings/queen would have to face the music.   




UPDATE: 19 July 2013 —  After all the hope and prays for Britain not to get involved in the civil war in Syria it is decided now that Britain is preparing to go to war in Syria. The reason given was that if the Assad regime collapses they want to prevent the stockpile of chemical weapons to fall into al-Qaeda’s hands.  It sounds the same reason, more or less, Tony Blair tried to convince the public about Hussain’s chemical weapons. Yet, they were never found and the illegal war cost too many lives. One point I have to make here is why not support Assad’s regime to defeat the rebels and prevent the stockpile, if it exists, to get into al-Qaeda’s hands? The picture which is shown as ‘prove’  in The Sun’s newspaper shows drums marked ‘toxic’ but it looks like standing in a street with people in the background.  To any ones mind it should surely be in highly secured in vaults if it contains such a deadly weapon. However, the real reason for going into Syria will never be known. So much for David Cameron’s promised transparency.


There is no doubt the world holds its breath again. The confrontation in Syria seems to increase after Mr Assad’s government is accused of having used chemical weapons but like in any other war propaganda is always the best weapon to achieve getting people onto your side. It is always hard to prove the truth. It wasn’t long ago the USA spreading rumours by Mr Bush Iraq has chemical weapons. He roped Tony Blair in and a war was declared illegally costing money, lives and at the end there was not one chemical weapon found.

It doesn’t mean that this time the use of chemical weapons is not true but it should have been a lesson for the USA and the West to learn not to jump so quickly on the band-wagon. Apparently not because the “Friends of Syria” which includes US, Britain, France and Germany as well as Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan meeting in Qatar next week. The meeting is about to decide whether to supply the rebels or as they call themselves Free Syria Army, with arms.

On account of this meeting Mr Assad called on Hezbollah and Iran fighters. This escalation should make the US and West think twice to get involved. The Hezbollah is regarded in the West as a terrorist organisation.

Having pointed out it also has to said that the Rebels or “Free Syria Army”, according to rumours and reports is also heavily infiltrated with Al-Qaeda which does not give a genuine cause to their fighting for democracy as stated. Al-Qaeda aims to get Syria under their control, establish a strict Muslim country with Sharia Law.

However, Mr Assad’s army supposed to have used chemical weapons the rebels are no better in shooting a 15 year old boy because he supposed to committed offence against their religion. Other rebels cut out the heart of a dead Syrian army soldiers and ate it. Therefore, none of the sides are any better and can point a finger at the opposition. This alone should make them put down their weapons and create peace.

Another rumour was circulating recently contradicting the report that Mr Assad used chemical weapons but it was the rebels. The US who is always the main power should look closer into these facts. Surely they even know more than it is revealed to the general public.

William Hague, UK’s Foreign Secretary, gave a statement that the UK has not yet decided to supply the rebels with arms. Could it be another white-wash? On Friday, ahead of the meeting next week the rebels received already a substantial supply of new weapons which could change the outcome.

FSA spokesman Louay Muqdad confirmed that they received a quantity of new weapons and some of them the FSA asked for. This supply did not come from the US.

As always in any confrontation of top leaders it is always the people who pay the price. This civil war already costs 90,000 lives, untold life long injuries and untold amount money in the two-years. Do the responsible leaders really want to continue?


UPDATE: 26 June 2013 — UK’s Prime Minister seems to be determined to go ahead with supporting the rebels. He is planning to hold a meeting between the spy chief, Ed Milliband the Labour leader and himself. This rare move of the Mr Cameron’s top briefing by the National Security Council is designed to win Mr Milliband support for forcing out Syrian Bashar Assad.


UPDATE:  22 June 2013 — Coming a meeting in Doha is planned to discuss and decide whether to give support to the rebels.  The countries will be US, Britain, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan. Already in advance the rebels received a quantity of new weapons and they stated that it was from the US. The rebels had recently some major defeats but hope now to turn the situation around.

Rumours running wild about chemical weapons and it looks like a copy of the time before the Iraq War.  At that time Mr Bush and his government sworn blind Iraq are stock piling chemical weapons.  The pressure increased and at the end ex-Prime minister Tony Blair fell for it and entered a war with the USA against Iraq.  Eventually, when they conquered Iraq no chemical weapons were found. Both Mr Bush and Mr Blair were never brought to justice in for being responsible of causing death, maiming and destruction in a country were they had no right to declare war.

Now again it seems a repeat of the same situation.  It is surprising that President Obama would repeat the same message that Syria’s President Bashar Assad uses chemical weapons.  A few weeks ago it was said that the rebels using chemical weapons which ever is the truth it will most probably never be known.  However, it was also revealed Al-Qaeda is infiltrating the rebels to back them would be backing a terrorists group which the whole world is fighting against. If all these information spread around has any footing at all it would be wise to stay out of the whole conflict.

Why is Britain so hell bend to get involved again? There supposed to be a low economy in this country and the public is pressure into more austerity yet no hesitation in getting involved into another costly war which could even escalate into a widespread war.

If there ever was any irresponsibility shown from the government it will be this time.  Foreign secretary William Hague and PM David Cameron are determined for months to enter the Syrian civil war with again an accusation of chemical weapons.  Britain did not look victorious in the Iraq war, Libya and nor is it in Afghanistan. Therefore the question being asked and remains  – Why getting involved again only because Russia and American wanting another play-ground.

Every time these super powers and are not that glorious any more wanting another war game it cost nothing but lives,  injuries with getting maimed for lives and horrendous amount of money which none of these countries can afford.  So where is the sense and responsibility to their people at all?

A lesson should have been learned with Libya where the West was backing the so called rebels or freedom fighters. The moment they were in power they turned their back on the West.  Murdered the American Embassy staff, destroyed graves of the British fallen soldiers and never released the Lockerbie bombers or revealed any information

Mr Newark stated that Britain has a moral obligation to step in. How on earth did Mr Newark arrive at an idea like that? What moral obligation has Britain got towards Syria to scarify again their soldiers and huge amount of money at the time where British people starve and have to go to food-banks and have to make decisions whether to heat their homes or buy food.

David Cameron who has a meeting with the Russian President Vladimir Putin tomorrow at 10 Down Street is believed to back the US.  Since it has been already hinted that the rebels are infiltrated by Al Qaeda it is sheer madness and irresponsibility to back them.

%d bloggers like this: