Archives for posts with tag: russia


One American News Networks gave a lengthy video about their investigation. The reporter finds no evidence of Chemical Weapons Attack in Douma, Syria.

He went to several parts of the town and spoke to many people in various places.

He visited hospitals and spoke to staff, doctors and Chief Surgeon. The video we saw was made because people came in and choked from dust created by the bombs from USA, UK and France.

The surgeon explained if there was a chemical gas attack it would make people faces sell up, eyes streaming and choking from lungs being affected. He claimed further that there were no deaths.

The reporter also spoke to the rebels and they admitted it was a hoax to keep the Syrian army out of Douma and to achieve a bus service for evacuation which they used to escape.

A Syrian girl also explains what happened behind the last ‘Chemical Attack’ in Douma on YouTube. The picture you saw of a family died of the so-called ‘Chemical Attack’ was a family living in a bunker using a wood burning stove and died of carbon monocide.

She also points out for Assad doing the ‘Chemical Attack’ had no motive because he was winning the war. She thinks it is all for Trump’s benefit to keep US soldiers in Syria with Israel’s support.  

A report in the Morning Star

Deputy Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said: “the consequences of illegal, unlawful military actions were the cause of the hold-up which inspectors were unable to access the side of the alleged attacks because it needs permission from the UN security experts.”

Not as UK press announced ‘the Russian refused OPCW to enter Douma’ which was slightly twisting the truth but would go against the Russians.

The Independent newspaper’s journalist Robert Fisk was one of the first to enter Douma. He tracked down the underground clinic from where the videos were made.

Dr Assim Rahaibani said that the videos were not staged but the patients did not suffer from chemical gases but from dust which filled the rubble-filled tunnels where they live. On the night of the heavy shelling it created a dust storm.

That explained why the patients did not show any chemical burn marks, coughing, wheezing and streaming red eyes if they were infected by a chemical attack.

France still insists that it has “proof” of chemical weapons were used – USA media reports urine and blood tests showed evidence – USA also insists on its original report of previous chemical attacks although investigated by WHO but reports were never published which makes it suspicious of not being Assad’s attack and so does UK.

A good confirmation is that people across the town denied there was a chemical gas attack – more detailed information from Robert Fisk in the Independent newspaper.

Although those reports are the truth, but it is hard for the public being constantly bombarded with false information. However, the people today are well informed and May should gamble on being able to brainwash them.

So where does May, Trump and Macro go from here after the contradicting reports being published? They must be aware of it.

It was most surprising for the public the speed they all went ahead with their bombing. They did not wait for the OPCW to go there and to find the evidence they so insist exist. This point is the most confusing for the people to accept and understand. You don’t rush in with bombing if you want evidence of a chemical attack and who done it, do you?

Or was this the reason for the sudden decisions to bomb? It would show that it wasn’t Russia or Assad and three non-so-wise kings/queen would have to face the music.   

Since the press running hot on Novichok claiming it is only produced by Russia and the recent incident at Salisbury can only be done by Russian other information came to light.

Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn was quite right to demand a prove but, of course, as soon as he opened his mouth to the contrary he is named as a communist.

BBC which is completely controlled by the Conservatories shown a huge picture in the background of Moscow and Jeremy Corbyn with a Russian hat on. It was pathetic especially from a well-known worldwide TV station to go to such an extent to label a man who voices his opinion!

While still discrediting Mr Corbyn; a report from Craig Murray was announced that he has received from a well-placed FCO source that Porton Down scientists are not able to identify the nerve gas as being of Russian manufacture and have been resentful of the pressure being placed on them.

UN stated that every Laboratory of their members have a sample of Novichok with each signature on it. Therefore, if it was legal obtained it should be able to be identified where it came from.

Another news came to light, Uzbekistan were in control of Novichok and when hy were not controlled by Russia. Could there have been a secret sale or theft?

Uzbekistan was part of the Soviet Union till 1991 and then became independent. Eight years later BBC and others reported US experts were helping to destroy its stocks of nerve-agents – especially Novichok. The country had been a major testing centre for chemical weapons.

During 1999 and 2000 the US destroyed the chemical weapon testing facility and it could also be that somebody kept a sample. After all USA is not exactly known for being open, honest and transparent.

BBC and the Tory controlled press keeps still singling out Russia as the culprit but never mentioned Uzbekistan when the country was not any more under Russian control. Surely, they must remember their previous report of US decommissioning of Novichok in Uzbekistan. Apparently, they ‘ignore’ these facts determine to back May’s claim that it is Russia.

For a Prime Minister it is not a very good move to point to Russia especially without concrete proof. It bound to backfire sooner than later.

Already, journalists and people asking questions of why the PM went to Salisbury where the crime occurred in area where the contamination happen without any protections. She was smiling and met people of very small group also being there holding a bunch of flowers as if it were a walk-about.

People also raised the question why May did not go to the hospital where father and daughter Skipal are critically ill and the policeman, who was the only other one got infected.

The Times reported no patients have symptoms of nerve-agent poisoning by Stephen Davies, Consultant in emergency medics, Salisbury NHS

Following the Salisbury attack the Government now plans to “tighten-up the Official Secrets Act” with longer jail sentences for journalists. This would be the final straw to break democracy. Cameron already gagged the press quite severely.

A further sickening fact emerged when the anti-Corbyn Labour MPs proclaimed to “stand-shoulder-to-shoulder” with the Tories. It is hard to understand their mentality why being Labour when you are so convinced that the Tories are perfect.

May expelled now 23 Russian diplomats despite not having one single solid prove the Novichok came from Russia.

 Another controversy in this sad saga is that several Tory MPs, including May, received £820m total from Russia since May became PM. MPs, press and people demand to return the money but Theresa May refused. Money which could not have been given for nothing and it is not a mannerism of a Prime Minister and her MPs.

Jeremy Corbyn is a real statesman, kept his head and asked for proof before jumping to conclusion. He knew what his demand will bring an uproar of abuse again but despite he stood up and announced his opinion. Hopefully, the truth will come out but until Russia is replying to May’s accusation we can only guess. 






UPDATE: 26 June 2013 — UK’s Prime Minister seems to be determined to go ahead with supporting the rebels. He is planning to hold a meeting between the spy chief, Ed Milliband the Labour leader and himself. This rare move of the Mr Cameron’s top briefing by the National Security Council is designed to win Mr Milliband support for forcing out Syrian Bashar Assad.


UPDATE:  22 June 2013 — Coming a meeting in Doha is planned to discuss and decide whether to give support to the rebels.  The countries will be US, Britain, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan. Already in advance the rebels received a quantity of new weapons and they stated that it was from the US. The rebels had recently some major defeats but hope now to turn the situation around.

Rumours running wild about chemical weapons and it looks like a copy of the time before the Iraq War.  At that time Mr Bush and his government sworn blind Iraq are stock piling chemical weapons.  The pressure increased and at the end ex-Prime minister Tony Blair fell for it and entered a war with the USA against Iraq.  Eventually, when they conquered Iraq no chemical weapons were found. Both Mr Bush and Mr Blair were never brought to justice in for being responsible of causing death, maiming and destruction in a country were they had no right to declare war.

Now again it seems a repeat of the same situation.  It is surprising that President Obama would repeat the same message that Syria’s President Bashar Assad uses chemical weapons.  A few weeks ago it was said that the rebels using chemical weapons which ever is the truth it will most probably never be known.  However, it was also revealed Al-Qaeda is infiltrating the rebels to back them would be backing a terrorists group which the whole world is fighting against. If all these information spread around has any footing at all it would be wise to stay out of the whole conflict.

Why is Britain so hell bend to get involved again? There supposed to be a low economy in this country and the public is pressure into more austerity yet no hesitation in getting involved into another costly war which could even escalate into a widespread war.

If there ever was any irresponsibility shown from the government it will be this time.  Foreign secretary William Hague and PM David Cameron are determined for months to enter the Syrian civil war with again an accusation of chemical weapons.  Britain did not look victorious in the Iraq war, Libya and nor is it in Afghanistan. Therefore the question being asked and remains  – Why getting involved again only because Russia and American wanting another play-ground.

Every time these super powers and are not that glorious any more wanting another war game it cost nothing but lives,  injuries with getting maimed for lives and horrendous amount of money which none of these countries can afford.  So where is the sense and responsibility to their people at all?

A lesson should have been learned with Libya where the West was backing the so called rebels or freedom fighters. The moment they were in power they turned their back on the West.  Murdered the American Embassy staff, destroyed graves of the British fallen soldiers and never released the Lockerbie bombers or revealed any information

Mr Newark stated that Britain has a moral obligation to step in. How on earth did Mr Newark arrive at an idea like that? What moral obligation has Britain got towards Syria to scarify again their soldiers and huge amount of money at the time where British people starve and have to go to food-banks and have to make decisions whether to heat their homes or buy food.

David Cameron who has a meeting with the Russian President Vladimir Putin tomorrow at 10 Down Street is believed to back the US.  Since it has been already hinted that the rebels are infiltrated by Al Qaeda it is sheer madness and irresponsibility to back them.

%d bloggers like this: